TO DEMOSTRATE HOW MAD
(Let’s study a map of the
five continents where man lives thanks to animal exploitation)
As we have said repeatedly,
vegans are theoretical people living in big cities; they have been
away neither from them nor from their apartments and even they
haven’t left their computers at all.
They think and act
according to their utopian books that talk about animal defense,
which they believe blindly as masterpieces; though there isn’t any
well-known vegan ideologist who is accepted by non-vegan people. (I
mean the rest 6.000 million people who are not vegan).
They are isolated in a
cultural and social ghetto where they influence each other by means
of Internet or private messages, talks and conferences. By those
means, they exchange artificial and harmful recipes on how to
replace milk, eggs and other essential products for human health,
(it is pathetic to see them exchanging products that do not contain
meat but have its appearance and its taste; products that do not
contain chicken, milk, eggs, honey, etc.; or extravagant products
like soya sausage and other mad ideas to replace what it cannot be
They have never heard or
they even don’t want to hear, the opinions of other organizations as
UNESCO and FAO which are serious institutions with non vegan experts
who know about such pertinent subjects.
They have never gone around
the world or they have never seen breeding or farm ranches; they are
so far away from farms, animals and the real world as we are so far
away from Mars or any other planet.
It is the only way we can
admit the mad ideas they propose, like the disuse of animals for
any purpose or the disuse of animal by- products though it doesn’t
mean to kill them (wool, milk, eggs, honey, etc).
For a utopian vegan who
lives in Buenos Aires or New York and who travels by subway, by car
or by train, it is not a problem to live without using animals as a
means of transport or to transport goods, food, warm clothing, etc.
Of course: city vegans
don’t live in mountainous areas, marshes, woods, swamps, broad
pampas and savannas and other places without roads in Latin America;
they don’t live in the deserts without paved roads, in cold areas in
the poles, in mountains and deserts in Africa and Asia which cannot
be reached by trains and cars; and they don’t even live in certain
areas of Europe which can be reached only by donkey or by horse.
In those areas, which are
practically half the earth’s surface, the horse, the donkey, the
mule, the yak, the reindeer, the Siberian huskies, the camels, the
different kinds of dromedaries, the buffaloes of Asia swamps, the
llama and dozens of similar animals are fundamental to travel and
to prevent men from being isolated.
Needless to say, those
areas where people cannot live without eating meat, without using
leather or fur and without drinking milk from those animals which
have adapted to the environment as Darwin’s theory says. Great part
of mankind would die or should emigrate from those areas where
living is possible thanks to the use of animals adapted to the
adverse soil and climate conditions. (For example the Sahara camel
has got a special nose and eyelashes to resist sand storms; it can
also resist long-term lack of water).
There are millions of
inhabitants of coastal areas that depend on aquatic animals like
fish and shellfish (in some coastal zones and some islands aquatic
animal products are the principal source of food; fishing industry,
which gives work to many people, prospers there). There are also
people who feed from ducks, geese, etc, (bred for millions in some
aquatic areas in China and the Asian Southeast)
Let’s take into account the
technical Japanese as an example of those who depend upon fish to
feed millions who live in a few and small islands and let’s multiply
it a hundred times in different areas and populations.
The inhabitants of the
desert or semi-deserted areas of America, Asia and Africa live on
goats, sheep, camels, etc, (nearly all Africa, half of Asia from the
ex Soviet Union Islamic Republics to the coast of China, the Andes
mountains in America, Nepal, Tibet, Northern India, Pakistan, great
part of the Arabian countries, etc).
The populations of
extremely cold areas like the Eskimo, the Northern Canada Indians,
Laplanders, Northern Asian inhabitants and Southern South America
inhabitants can also be named, together with populations in warm
rainforest areas and marshes in Asia and Oceania.
Vegans ignore or are not
interested in all these facts.
The only thing they worry
about is animals.
All these facts can be
graphically seen if you mark in red the areas in a five continent
Don’t forget all the areas:
the coastal, the desert, the arid or semi-arid, the extremely cold
and the mountainous ones. Most times there is an animal of that
hostile habitat that has allowed man to survive for centuries.
The result in the map you
draw (you can send it to this website) will clarify the vegan
madness as it will show how the vegan philosophy will mean death,
disappearance and emigration for millions of people.
Moreover to stop using
animals and its by-products will imply the concentration of millions
and millions of people in urban areas with all its consequent
pollution, fire, water shortage, lack of food will occur due to the
concentration of human beings.
One thousand and two
hundred million Muslims would let themselves be killed or they would
fight fiercely before putting an end to their religious rite of Aid
or Lamb Feast. There, many animals are sacrificed and then they are
eaten to recall the Sacrifice of Abraham’s son and his being
replaced by a lamb.
All scientific investigation
performed with rats, Guinea pigs and other animals which allowed
human life to be lengthen will stop; these investigations have not
only permitted man to get to a lifespan he wouldn’t even dream of 50
years ago but also to cure diseases and illnesses and consequently
to improve human life in every aspect.
It would be a total
disaster but of course vegans don’t care about it. If fact, they
invent unreal solutions for the problems that would arise if the
vegan theses succeed. But all these theories are unfeasible and
utopian, and they come from people who don’t know more than what is
heard in the vegan circles and who do not reason, analyze and study.
They solve everything by
means of their computers or with the vegan books of some
“enlightened” persons like Peter Singer, who after having said
nonsense when he was a youngster, (in the first edition of his book
“Animal Liberation” he said that if an ill child and a chimpanzee
entered a room, the chimpanzee must be chosen), he changed his mind
radically and approved animal use provided it is in a humanitarian
way (we all agree with him).
Don’t forget the
uncontrolled animal growth, many animals are extremely aggressive
and will compete with the human beings for food, moreover they will
transmit epidemic diseases to man as they won’t be kept under
Let’s take an example: the
busy bees that give us honey. As vegans prohibit its use, millions
and millions of bees would have to be freed from beehives that exist
all over the world.
At liberty, the pacific
bees will be invaded by the African ones that would kill the queen
bees and would replace them by their queens; these animals are
extremely dangerous for man; if they were left uncontrolled, they
would invade all the habitats, not only the ones in the country but
in the cities as well; consequently they would kill and cause
Something similar will
happen to many other animal species: the most aggressive, the most
dangerous and harmful for man will live and reproduce without
The vegan philosophers don’t
explain what to do with the millions of birds and livestock: from
the most famous cattle breeds to pigs, sheep, goats, horses and
rabbits. They are the result of a long selection and genetic work
carried out by man to produce more food and as they were bred in
captivity, they wouldn’t know how to live at liberty. They would be
the first easy prey of rodents and predators.
As the natural fertilizer
of animals bred in captivity would not exist (in Europe it can be
seen piles and heaps of excrement collected by people in autumn,
summer and spring to be used as fertilizer in spring); synthetic or
mineral fertilizers would have to be used and they are not a
renewable resource. Not only they deteriorate and exhaust the soil
but no agriculture will be possible once they are used up.
Fur, leather, wool and silk
couldn’t be worn but just synthetic fabrics which are highly
polluting and which will disappear after a while.
All these subjects show us
that it is very easy to write books and send e-mails in Internet
talking about totally utopian and unfeasible doctrines.
It is pathetic that due to
their unsolved problems of their childhood, the ideologists and the
vegan extremists unconsciously want to destroy humanity by trying to
impose their ideas by force and deceit.
They had better look for a
good psychiatrist and solve their problems.