BETWEEN ANIMAL WELFARE AND ANIMAL RIGHTS
breeders, in general, are in the group of people who seek
for animal welfare which means those people who use animals
(as the Bible, all the millenary traditions of our Culture
and all monotheist religions recommend) but do not abuse
from them or maltreat them unnecessarily, etc.
The Empress, the
great American Association of chinchilla breeders,
recommends all their members to register and certify their
ranches to strictly comply with human treatment to
chinchillas from birth to death in order to achieve animal
A veterinarian must
fairly certify human treatment.
Argentina and other
countries agree with all the Empress’ recommendations.
The United States
Veterinarian Association also supports the thesis which
admits animal use and consumption if human treatment and
animal welfare are provided.
The animal rights
defenders (vegans for example) state that in no
circumstances can animals be used and in no way can animal
products or their by-products be consumed (milk, eggs,
honey, wool, leather, etc).
If rights are
granted to animals and they are equated to man THERE IS NO
justification to kill them, to take milk from a cow or to
take eggs from hens, etc.
Dunkirk, PeTA’s director, has publicly stated that she is
not interested in human treatment to animals and the
achievement of animal welfare for all animals in captivity.
What they seek for
is the non exploitation and the total cease of using animals
and all their products whether they are wool, milk, etc
Human treatment in
order to achieve animal welfare does not help vegans meet
their aforementioned objectives. Dunkirk has said on TV that
“…We are not interested in larger and more comfortable cages
or cleaner and bigger barns. We want no more cages or barns,
have fundamental objectives which are very difficult to
accomplish; to achieve them they must collect millions and
millions of dollars and get millions and millions of
That is the reason
why they do not hesitate to lie and to say that animals are
subject to terrible suffering in order to collect more money
(which they use for themselves and not for the animals) and
to attract more people, but when they see or they are given
proof that such animal maltreatment does not exist, they
show their true objectives.
You have to take
into account that whatever the religion could be, the
legislation of any country of the world says that ONLY
PEOPLE HAVE RIGHTS BUT THEY HAVE OBLIGATIONS AS WELL.
These people want
animals to be at an upper level than man so they want RIGHTS
for them but no obligations at all.
Yet, it is
interesting to see the terrible contradiction of their
thoughts and doctrines, because man cannot or must not eat
meat, drink milk, eat fish but a kitten can eat fish or
drink milk. The fox can hunt and kill other animals to feed
from them but man cannot. Alas! What a terrible
contradiction which is impossible to solve!
No animal rights
defender talked the previous week N. Neumann ridiculously
posed nude or the day the Riachuelo’s river rodent
extermination and Buenos Aires City squares insect
extermination were announced in all newspapers.
rats, mosquitoes and lice can be killed! Rabbits,
chinchillas, minks cannot! They have declared themselves
Gods who can decide who must die and who mustn’t!
DIFFERENCES BETWEEN PETA AND GREENPEACE MUST BE CLARIFIED
don’t want to overwhelm people with information but we want
to inform people who these vegan fanatics are.
People must not
confuse PeTA with Greenpeace and other ecological
organizations. (PeTA is a group of fanatics and scoundrels
who collect money and receive donations to defend animals
but they actually lead an easy life and have millionaire
salaries and travel allowances. In a separate article we are
going to detail the balance sheets and the scandals that
came out about what they do with the money. As it is
completely discredited in the Northern Hemisphere, it has
come to Argentina to make publicity campaigns with models
like Nicole Newmann).
and protests against those who destroy forests, pollute the
seas and destroy the environment BUT IT IS NOT OPPOSED TO
BREEDING ANIMALS IN CAPTIVITY. IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH
an article La Nación newspaper published about Nicole
Newmann and her posing nude against wearing fur, there is a
comment made by World Wild Foundation which says:
“If the coats are
made with prohibited or endangered species, WWF not only
exposes but also and condemns the ones who made them. But
if the fur coats are made legally and as a result of a
rational and sustainable use of wildlife fauna, then the
coat is as legal (for example the otter is not in danger of
extinction) as a leather jacket, a handbag or a pair of